The biggest problem i see if it becomes "hitting it is kos". Does that mean everyone who its it is kos? How do you know a blue is going to be honest with killing a red for hitting a breakable? Anyone can walk up to a cell that has one red and a breakable and kill them even if they didnt hit it and say they hit it, there is no proof he didnt hit it or did hit it. Another problem is if a red is hitting the wall next to it how do you know he isnt tricking you to have you freekill him? The breakable breaking is proof that someone is rebelling or doing something they shouldnt.
For a LOT of things, you can't give proof...
If a red decided to break a breakable and a blue claims it was someone else than the person that actually did it, that blue does not have proof for that.
If the red that was killed recorded it, there was proof against the actual blue.
Doesn't say break-ing in the sub-context. I take it literally. Plus, If it's during a round you obviously kill a red who is breaking a breakable because they are usually delaying or not with the non-rebelling reds / warden. It's when there's a freeday and I'm walking around; I decide to hit a random wall and get killed for it because I allegedly was "breaking a breakable". You should have to completely break the breakable to be KOS, and the breakables have to lead away from reds or into armory (meaning breaking glass in minecraft map is allowed unless warden states otherwise). If anything has to be done, it should be clarifying the rule to state whether hitting breakables is KOS, because it does not state hitting.
The TITLE of the rule is the actual rule, the sub-context is a quick explanation of the rule.
This sub-context does not contradict the actual rule, it just gives more information but fails to say that breaking is also KOS.
This rule has not been changed for a long time, and the rule has always been that you can not hit breakables.
It used to be, that you could not hit breakables that went to a "blue" area but was changed to that you just can not hit breakables at all.
Never had, I mostly just picked them up from regulars and I just copy-paste AFTER I ask other admins if it sounds fine. No idea why people are playing the blame game without proof.
Regulars fuck up the rules a lot, was always the case, will always be the case. (not always their fault, there are a number of reasons that it can happen)
If people want the rule to be changed, I would suggest adding a poll.
