Declined Give donors the power to revive

[buud]

A vote for donors to revive, if one person gets freekilled revive them and then slay the freekiller.
Options for vote revive: single person
bunch: x3, x5, x10 depending on how hard the freekill was
if the revived person abuses it they get banned.

 

[Lightion]

make person who abuses not able to ever spawn lolol!

 

[Melectrome]

I can already see how this will be abused if it gets implemented. Basically a donor could vote to revive 10 people mid-round and the killed people would vote yes, which would result in 10 people respawning and total chaos.
plsno

 

[Lightion]

respawn blues to lol

 

[will5023]

didnt even think about random revives i was thinking people could just revive friends but yeah that makes me sure i dont think this should be added

 

[Wanka]

The idea alone is stupid and reckless, but even more so with the whole "bunches" idea. There are two ways it can be handled off the top of my head:

1. The donator has to choose who specifically gets resurrected. This means they can choose their friends, even if they weren't freekilled, and leave other people who were meant to be revived to just sit there and wait.

2. The donator gets no choice and it's just a random bunch of dead people who get resurrected. This can result in RNG randomly resurrecting people who were meant to stay dead.

 

[Pkay]

This is wrong, no donor would time their "respawn" and even so, if it were with votes 30 secs after the vote a lot can change, so the warden has to watch out for possible new enemies that might respawn and cause chaos. This might also be heavily biased, most admins try not to recklessly respawn people that died as not everyone tells the truth. I personally only respawn people I know that have been freekilled or respawn everyone in a save environment for the blues and reds.

 

[O C E A N M A N]

As a donor, this ability would be very useful but the chances of abuse, accidental revives or reviving the wrong person are far too high for it to be implemented. No person is perfect, especially a donor, and the vote delay is also something you would have to consider. If more than one person was freekilled but your options are 1, 5, 10 etc. You would have to spend upwards of 2 minutes just reviving 3 players

 

[hey ya]

This is a really niche decision that affects only jailbreak, and wouldn't be useful anywhere else (other than vsh where it could be abused).

 

[Deleted member 2049]

I can see the reports coming in now. There a numerous amount of reason why this shouldnt be added. Mainly because if a donor either disagrees on a kill or if they are salty and want to continue to play. This clearly shouldnt be added because of trust with donors isnt high enough

 

[Lightion]

lol make it so that donors can slay without needing the vote

 

[buud]

I can already see how this will be abused if it gets implemented. Basically a donor could vote to revive 10 people mid-round and the killed people would vote yes, which would result in 10 people respawning and total chaos.
plsno

true but 1 person revive isnt that bad

 

[Paragon]

With how easy it is for people to get donor it would be BEYOND abused. Literally any child with a big enough influence can revive anyone. Honestly if you would want to do that you would need a way to have donor be more difficult to get.

 

[Lightion]

100$ for weekly donor ez

 

[Mars?]

Usually when an admin respawns someone they teleport them. What if a donor respawn someone claiming its a freekill but the group of blus are already at a far point of the map?? That makes an easy rebel for the respawned red and if they do give donors the power to teleport what are the odds of trollers that teleports people into a pit of lava or something

 

[Jim]

Necro bump to decline based on ratings