Melectrome
Legendary
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2017
- Messages
- 656
Reason? Sometimes people with no mics or during mass freekills after being muted are still on blu, and it's a real hassle to do 2 votes.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!What if we added a new command, like /votemuteslay. So if you need to just mute someone you could do so.I do not think this is a good idea because if you decide to votemute and it is the end of the round but he switches to red he will get slayed, same thing for reds they can get slayed for not doing anything bad.
Yeah, something like that would be cool.What if we added a new command, like /votemuteslay. So if you need to just mute someone you could do so.
Oh, crap! My bad.The reason we have the 30 second interval between votes is because It inhibits the donors power and reduces donor abuse. Still, this wouldn't be such a bad idea. Lets see what the staff say.
BTW, this should go in suggestions. Just an FYI.
I am highly against this. Say you votemute someone on red because of micspam. If it goes through they could be unjustly slayed.
What if we added a new command, like /votemuteslay. So if you need to just mute someone you could do so.
Then they would get off blue once the vote is over. If you're muted you're not supposed to be on blueWhat if you wanted to mute someone for micspamming?
What if you wanted to mute someone for micspamming?
What if we added a new command, like /votemuteslay. So if you need to just mute someone you could do so.